QuickTold: Australia tells Apple it can't stop other companies from naming products starting with the letter 'i'.

Added 2010-03-15, 05:51 PM | 10 Replies

Name
Subject
Comment

Have news of Apple getting told? Found a Mac user making an arrogant comment on a forum somewhere? Send it in!

ToldNet: tell

Status as of 03:24 PM: Apple TOLD | Microsoft TOLD | AT&T TOLD | Intel TOLD | AMD TOLD | Nvidia NOT TOLD

> /g/ - United Tech Support Service !TrIpCoDekE 03/15/10(Mon)18:01 No.6718 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
It's always irked me that Apple can claim exclusive use of prefacing their product name with a lowercase 'i'.
> Anonymous 03/15/10(Mon)21:13 No.6720 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
faggyest trend ever

I wish it was limited to apple
> Anonymous 03/15/10(Mon)23:40 No.6722 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
>>6720
THIS.
> Anonymous 03/16/10(Tue)02:47 No.6723 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
iTold
> Anonymous 03/16/10(Tue)04:36 No.6724 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
>Apple failed to demonstrate that a "person of ordinary intelligence and memory" would automatically assume that just because a product carries the letter "i" it is an Apple product.

But a macfag would
> Anonymous 03/16/10(Tue)05:16 No.6725 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
I've known of thing that have started with "i" long before Apple existed, along with E, X, and Z.
> Pika-Index !Yo/g/o4wiA 03/16/10(Tue)05:36 No.6726 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
>>6720
> Anonymous 03/16/10(Tue)10:20 No.6727 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
You fags sure got iTold.
> Anonymous 03/17/10(Wed)12:38 No.6735 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
Infogear put out a product called the "iPhone" in 1998, a few years before Apple first marketed even the iPod in 2001 (though I'm not sure when/where/what began Apple's iProduct naming scheme, exactly). It's understandable for companies to try to protect their trademarks (as failure to do so diminishes their ability to do so later) but, like the suit against Woolworth's for their apple-shaped logo, it's rather ridiculous to claim a monopoly on this kind of thing.
> Anonymous 03/21/10(Sun)15:18 No.6771 
ToldNet: No functions currently available.
iTold